Honda CR-V 2004 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 22 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 66 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 828 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |