Honda CR-V 2002 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 33 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 20 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
952 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
| |