Honda CR-V 2002 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 85 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 210 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 16.2 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 7.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1065 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 3 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 579 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |