Honda CR-V 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001

 
Honda CR-V
2002 - 2004
Nissan X-Trail
2001 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.2 Diesel
Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.

Performance

Power: 150 HP114 HP
Torque: 190 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds13.7 seconds
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive.
Honda CR-V engine produces 36 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 80 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.17.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.5 l/100km8.3 l/100km
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 285 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
750 km on highway1000 km on highway
610 km with real consumption720 km with real consumption
Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking.

Nissan X-Trail 2001: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating.

Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ...  More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.51 m
Width: 1.78 m1.76 m
Height: 1.71 m1.68 m
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 7 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 525 litres410 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litres1841 litres
Honda CR-V has 115 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 889 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9102`050
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

average
Honda CR-V has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Nissan X-Trail, so Honda CR-V quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 22002000
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Nissan X-Trail has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv