Honda CR-V 2002 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 51 HP less power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 93 NM less than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 13.0 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.66 m | |
| Honda CR-V and Lexus RX are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
952 litres | 1725 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 36 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Lexus RX (by 773 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.8 metres less than that of the Lexus RX, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 2`270 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`485 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 425 kg | 480 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Lexus RX. Therefore, Lexus RX is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Lexus RX has
| |