Honda CR-V 2002 vs Land Rover Defender 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 28 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, but torque is 110 NM less than Land Rover Defender. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 7.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Defender engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Land Rover Discovery | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 2.08 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Defender, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 37 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
952 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 2.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`910 kg | 3`500 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 20 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |