Honda CR-V 2002 vs Hyundai Terracan 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Hyundai Terracan) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Hyundai Terracan have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 143 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Terracan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Hyundai Terracan 2001: The base model is equipped with a button-operated part-time all-wheel drive system, while the Highlander variation features an automatic all-wheel drive system that is normally rear-wheel drive, but automatically assigns torque to the front wheels as required. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Kia Carnival | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Terracan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 13 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1955 litres | |
|
Hyundai Terracan has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 645 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Terracan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai Terracan (by 1003 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |