Honda CR-V 2002 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Ford Maverick have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 10 NM less than Ford Maverick. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Ford Maverick 2000: The AWD system typically directs the majority of the engine`s power to the front wheels. If slippage is detected at the front, power is quickly redirected to the rear wheels via a Rotary Blade Coupling, which can transfer up to 100% of the power to rear axis. Switching the system from `Auto` to `On` locks the front and rear axles at a 50/50 split and reduces the reaction time needed to engage the rear wheels through an integrated bypass clutch. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 14 cm longer than the Ford Maverick, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Maverick has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 460 litres less trunk space than the Ford Maverick. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |