Honda CR-V 2002 vs BMW X5 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (BMW X5) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 34 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 220 NM less than BMW X5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine BMW X5 2001 2.9 engine: Overall, the M57 diesel engine is known for its high reliability and can deliver an exceptionally long service life when properly maintained with high-quality fuel and oil. Fuel quality is especially critical ... More about BMW X5 2001 2.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 9 cm shorter than the BMW X5, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 60 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The BMW X5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW X5 (by 598 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.6 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW X5 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
BMW X5 has
| |