Honda CR-V 2001 vs Subaru Forester 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 22 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Forester. Despite the higher power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
670 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 855 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`875 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |