Honda CR-V 2001 vs Jeep Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 319 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 64 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 14.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 14.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 705 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 490 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.87 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 9 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 446 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 1280 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |