Honda CR-V 2001 vs Subaru Forester 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 22 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Subaru Forester has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |