Honda CR-V 1999 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 3 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 1997: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Toyota RAV4 2000: Vehicle has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger, but slightly lower. Honda CR-V is 33 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 25 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |