Honda CR-V 1997 vs Subaru Forester 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Subaru Forester is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 42 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Subaru Forester. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.58 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
670 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 855 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`900 kg | 1`935 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`445 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 470 kg | 490 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |