Honda CR-V 1997 vs Subaru Forester 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 3 HP more power than Subaru Forester, but torque is 2 NM less than Subaru Forester. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
| Subaru Forester gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Subaru Impreza, Subaru Legacy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Subaru Forester might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
670 litres | 1525 litres | |
|
Subaru Forester has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Forester (by 855 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Subaru Forester. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`900 kg | 1`875 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`440 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 470 kg | 435 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |