Honda CR-V 1997 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 35 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 218 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 3 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 8 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 729 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |