Honda CR-V 1997 vs Opel Frontera 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 202 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
Honda CR-V engine produces 8 HP less power than Opel Frontera, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Opel Frontera. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Frontera. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
670 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
600 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Opel Frontera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Opel Sintra | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Opel Frontera engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.69 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.75 m | |
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 16 cm shorter than the Opel Frontera, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 1720 litres | |
Opel Frontera has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 165 litres less trunk space than the Opel Frontera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Frontera (by 1050 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.8 metres less than that of the Opel Frontera, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`510 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Opel Frontera has
| |