Honda CR-V 1997 vs Nissan Terrano 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Terrano, but torque is 96 NM less than Nissan Terrano. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Terrano. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Terrano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan Terrano, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 115 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 1900 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 260 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Terrano. The Nissan Terrano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Terrano (by 1230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Terrano, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan Terrano has
| |