Honda CR-V 1997 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 359 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 115 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 177 NM less than Nissan Pathfinder. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 15.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 750 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 540 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 1076 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 2407 litres | |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 701 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 1737 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |