Honda CR-V 1997 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 128 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 182 NM | 154 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Honda CR-V engine produces 33 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 45 years | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mitsubishi L 200 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.57 m | |
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 10 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 11 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`400 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 4600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
| |