Honda CR-V 1997 vs Isuzu Trooper 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.1 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Isuzu Trooper) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 3 HP more power than Isuzu Trooper, but torque is 93 NM less than Isuzu Trooper. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.0 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu Trooper, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 85 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Isuzu Trooper gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Isuzu Trooper engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.85 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm shorter than the Isuzu Trooper, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.7 metres more than that of the Isuzu Trooper, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`900 kg | 2`600 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`955 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 470 kg | 645 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 37 procentiem less than Isuzu Trooper. Therefore, Isuzu Trooper is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Isuzu Trooper has
| |