Honda CR-V 1997 vs Ford Maverick 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Maverick) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 16.7 seconds | |
| 
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 3 HP more power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 96 NM less than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds faster.  | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.5 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.85 m | |
| 
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 17 cm lower.  | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down  | 
670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high  | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: | 
Honda CR-V has    
    
  | 
Ford Maverick has    
    
  | |
