Honda CR-V 1997 vs Ford Maverick 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford Maverick, but torque is 9 NM less than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 12.3 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Maverick, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |