Honda CR-V 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 55 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 99 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 12 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1053 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2008 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 553 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`270 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Volvo XC60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo XC60, so Volvo XC60 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 12 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |