Honda CR-V 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 14 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 12 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 8.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Nissan X-Trail 2014: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1053 litres | 497 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2008 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`070 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |