Honda CR-V 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 251 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 1 HP more power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 30 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-5 2012: Engine power is automatically (without driver intervention) distributed among the wheels based on conditions using a hydraulic multi-disc clutch, viscous clutch, or similar traction control device. Some systems allow locking of multi-disc clutch manually for permanent all wheel drive. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1053 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2008 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda CX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 388 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`058 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9800 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |