Honda CR-V 2023 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 59 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.2 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1671 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 84 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 239 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`258 | 2`470 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |