Honda CR-V 2023 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021

 
Honda CR-V
2023 -
Skoda Kodiaq
2021 - 2023
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 190 HP150 HP
Torque: 240 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.8 seconds
Honda CR-V engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Kodiaq, but torque is 10 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.9
Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 57 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle840 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway1160 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.70 m4.70 m
Width: 1.87 m1.88 m
Height: 1.68 m1.69 m
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 589 litres835 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1671 litres2065 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space.
Honda CR-V has 246 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 394 litres).
Turning diameter: 12 meters12.2 meters
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq.
Gross weight: 2`258 kg2`244 kg
Net weight:1`613 kg1`524 kg
Load capacity:645 kg720 kg
Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Skoda Kodiaq. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 45 00028 600
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • more power
Skoda Kodiaq has
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv