Honda CR-V 2023 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 101 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 161 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.2 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2022: The 2022 Honda CR-V AWD is a front-wheel-drive-based, on-demand system. Under normal traction, drive torque is sent mainly to the front axle. When the control system detects slip or predicts reduced grip from sensor inputs, an electronically controlled hydraulic multi-plate clutch in the rear drive unit progressively couples the rear axle. Torque transfer is variable, automatic, and managed through wheel-speed, throttle, steering-angle, and VSA/traction-control data. In steady cruising, rear axle engagement is minimized to reduce drag and fuel consumption. It is not a fixed full-time AWD or a lockable 4WD system. Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 194 mm (7.6 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 82 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 210 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`470 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`806 kg | 1`977 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 544 kg | 493 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |