Honda CR-V 2023 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 97 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 181 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.6 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Kodiaq, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 835 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 2065 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 248 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 423 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`350 kg | 2`373 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`806 kg | 1`719 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 544 kg | 654 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Skoda Kodiaq. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |