Honda CR-V 2023 vs Porsche Macan 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 252 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.7 seconds | |
|
Porsche Macan is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 104 HP less power than Porsche Macan, whereas torque is 181 NM less than Porsche Macan. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Porsche Macan, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | 300 mm (11.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Porsche Macan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine: This engine, while more reliable than previous versions of the EA88 series, still has several characteristic issues. The main problems include:
Timing chain stretching. The chain typically lasts around ... More about Porsche Macan 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.62 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Porsche Macan, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 1795 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 87 litres more trunk space than the Porsche Macan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Porsche Macan (by 153 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres less than that of the Porsche Macan, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`750 kg | 1`795 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 715 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem less than Porsche Macan. Therefore, Porsche Macan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 54 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Porsche Macan has
| |