Honda CR-V 2023 vs Nissan X-Trail 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 111 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | 205 mm (8.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2022 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger, but lower. Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 587 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 1298 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Honda CR-V has more luggage space (by 12 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 344 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`285 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`750 kg | 1`640 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 645 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 39 400 | 35 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |