Honda CR-V 2023 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 18 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 131 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.1 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger, but slightly lower. Honda CR-V is 1 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 37 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 235 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`310 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`750 kg | 1`590 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 720 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 41 procentiem less than Nissan X-Trail. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 25 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |