Honda CR-V 2023 vs BMW X3 2021
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 100 HP less power than BMW X3, whereas torque is 161 NM less than BMW X3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 9.4 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 184 mm (7.2 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW X3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of BMW X3 2021 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 1 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 1600 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 42 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`360 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`750 kg | 1`850 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 510 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 40 400 | 43 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
BMW X3 has
| |