Honda CR-V 2023 vs Audi Q5 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Honda CR-V) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Audi Q5) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Audi Q5 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 117 HP less power than Audi Q5, whereas torque is 181 NM less than Audi Q5. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 12.20 $ | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.68 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Audi Q5, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 587 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1642 litres | 1520 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 67 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 122 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q5, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`260 kg | 2`445 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`750 kg | 1`760 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 510 kg | 685 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 34 procentiem less than Audi Q5. Therefore, Audi Q5 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 34 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |