Honda CR-V 2023 vs Volvo XC60 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 5.3 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 172 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 211 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.8 | 2.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 5750 km in combined cycle | 2380 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2017: This Volvo has Haldex Generation V proactive automatic four-wheel drive. It analyzes input from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster application when needed. During normal driving, the torque split is 100% to the front and no torque to the rear. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50% to 50%). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 153 mm (6 inches) | 216 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 2 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 617 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1710 litres | 1432 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 112 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 278 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`700 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`916 kg | 2`120 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 514 kg | 580 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem less than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Volvo XC60 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |