Honda CR-V 2023 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Honda CR-V) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Skoda Kodiaq) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 148 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 97 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 181 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 0.8 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 16.10 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 5750 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 617 litres | 835 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1710 litres | 2065 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 218 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 355 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`373 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`916 kg | 1`719 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 514 kg | 654 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Skoda Kodiaq. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |