Honda CR-V 2022 vs Skoda Kodiaq 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (Honda CR-V) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Skoda Kodiaq) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 100 HP less power than Skoda Kodiaq, whereas torque is 183 NM less than Skoda Kodiaq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | no data | 17.90 $ | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1113 litres | 835 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2166 litres | 2065 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 278 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Kodiaq. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 101 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Kodiaq, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`373 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 45 000 | 28 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Skoda Kodiaq has
| |