Honda CR-V 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 4 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.1 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
940 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 680 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`135 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |