Honda CR-V 2019 vs Mazda CX-5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 5 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 506 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1692 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 9 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 72 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`275 | 2`115 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 26 000 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |