Honda CR-V 2017 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 45 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1030 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Karoq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Karoq version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Skoda Karoq 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 21 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 24 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |