Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019

 
Honda CR-V
2017 - 2019
Mazda CX-30
2019 - 2021
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.8 Diesel

Performance

Power: 160 HP116 HP
Torque: 350 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds12.6 seconds
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive.
Honda CR-V engine produces 44 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.15.0
Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 53 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1100 km on highway1060 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected.

Ground clearance: 165 mm (6.5 inches)175 mm (6.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda CX-30 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda CX-30 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mazda CX-30 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you.

Dimensions

Length: 4.59 m4.40 m
Width: 1.85 m1.80 m
Height: 1.68 m1.56 m
Honda CR-V is larger.
Honda CR-V is 19 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 12 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 497 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1110 litres1406 litres
Honda CR-V has 67 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 296 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`2001`969
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 19 20023 400
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Mazda CX-30 has
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv