Honda CR-V 2018 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 146 HP | 240 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 94 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 8.5 | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1455 litres | |
Honda CR-V has 2 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC60 (by 345 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`275 | 2`270 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 19 200 | 14 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |