Honda CR-V 2018 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 146 HP | 146 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 196 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 21 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.6 | |
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1230 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`275 | 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Average price (€): | 19 200 | 16 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |