Honda CR-V 2018 vs Mazda CX-5 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 9 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 6.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Mazda CX-5 2017 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.55 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 4 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1110 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 510 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`240 kg | 2`025 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`614 kg | 1`559 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 626 kg | 466 kg | |
| Honda CR-V load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 26 procentiem more than Mazda CX-5. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |