Honda CR-V 2018 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 146 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 34 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 49 NM less than Mazda CX-30. Despite less power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.6 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1290 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1260 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Honda CR-V version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from nine 4x4 versions of Honda CR-V 2018 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 19 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 67 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |