Honda CR-V 2019 vs Skoda Karoq 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 45 HP less power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 145 NM less than Skoda Karoq. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.9 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Honda CR-V version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from nine 4x4 versions of Honda CR-V 2019 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 21 cm longer than the Skoda Karoq, 1 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 24 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Karoq. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Karoq, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`213 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Honda CR-V scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 18 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |