Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 189 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 30 HP less power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Mazda CX-30. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.6 | |
|
The Mazda CX-30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 57 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Mazda CX-30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 175 mm (6.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Honda CR-V can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 19 cm longer than the Mazda CX-30, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1406 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 67 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-30 (by 296 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |