Honda CR-V 2015 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 16 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.10 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 21 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 94 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 214 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |