Honda CR-V 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.10 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 28 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 39 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.7 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 400 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |